Complex

Subpersonalities, parts .

Definition.

A complex is a part of the human psyche which holds collections of related memories, affects and beliefs. Complexes, sometimes called subpersonalities or parts, are the denizens of our inner world, the actors in our dreams,footnote 1 and their presence has been noted by psychologists, philosophers and artists across multiple cultures and eras.

The psyche is not an indivisible unity but a divisible and more or less divided whole. Although the separate parts are connected with one another, they are relatively independent, so much so that certain parts of the psyche never become associated with the ego at all, or only very rarely. I have called these psychic fragments ‘autonomous complexes,’ and I based my theory of complexes on their existence.

Carl Jungfootnote 2

Complexes as subpersonalities .

Our complexes — our subpersonalities — have their own perspectives, desires, and needs, and are best understood as semi-autonomous or autonomous. This means that, even though we usually feel as if our ‘I,’ our ego, is driving our mental ‘car,’ a triggered complex can bump us over and take control of the wheel for a while. When this happens, we see the world through their uniquely colored lenses. Their logic becomes our logic, and their priorities become our own. We may act in ways that seem ‘unlike’ us, and after they’re gone, we may be left wondering, ‘Why did I do/say that?’

Our complexes often hold the traits that we don’t like to see in ourselves: our addictions, our prejudices, or secret wishes, our resentments. They may also represent our fragility — a wounded child self or suppressed artist, as well as any the dreamy, gullible, and lovely but unworldly parts. In many respects, these subpersonalities are the most precious — and the most neglected — aspects of ourselves. When we take the time to welcome them home, our complexes can become our greatest treasures.

These inner entities … are altruistic and their behavior is motivated rather than random. Their intentions for the internal system are positive.

— Richard Schwartzfootnote 3

Though we most often experience subpersonalities most directly when they are ‘constellated’ or triggered out by some external world experience, we can choose to reach out to them at other times. Two great processes for communicating with our complexes are dreamwork and active imagination.

Here are a few additional, important points about subpersonalities and complexes:

They have an archetypal core

Humanity’s recurring patterns of person and experience — often clothed in myth and dreams — are known as archetypes. Taking their origin in the most subtle reaches of psyche, we often experience archetypes as magical, powerful, or numinous. They stop us in our tracks, give us goosebumps, and knock our socks off. And they are at the heart of each of our complexes — the source of their power, fascination, and energy. If we take complex theory seriously, this archetypal principle can bring a great deal of magic into our experience of our lives and the world.

You, too, are a complex

The person you experience as ‘I’ is traditionally understood in complex psychology as the ego, or the ego-complex. This is the part of us who experiences ongoing consciousness and interacts with the world, makes ethical choices, and experiences the coming and going of the other complexes. Though we spend most of our time in the driver’s seat of our lives, we, too, are collections of related memories, affects and beliefs. In this way, we are one complex among many.

The psyche is multiple

If we take the idea of complexes seriously, we develop a picture of the psyche as multiple. This means that each of us, inside, is one of many. Often, when we begin to address our complexes as individuals with their own needs and preferences, life begins to run more smoothly.

Multiple personality alters differ only in degree

The alters of multiple personality (dissociative identity) can be understood as complexes with more profound barriers between them. The tools of complex psychology can be adapted for those with traumatic dissociation.

I feel like I’m a gathering of personalities. Not that I’m split off from them … like people with multiple personality disorder. I seem to be a combination of characters … There’s the playful, mischievous me who tends to stir things up … Then I can swing into the serious-minded overbearing conventional me … She’s not so much fun, but I rely on her to help keep my nose to the grindstone. There are a whole bunch of characters in me, and I think I need them all.

— Tracia, a gifted adult quoted by Mary-Elaine Jacobsenfootnote 4

Complex psychology .

Complex psychology explores the unconscious mind, the realm of psyche where our multiplicity of ‘selves’ resides. Complex psychology can be understood as a synonym for depth psychology.

The unconscious is a marvelous universe of unseen energies, forces, forms of intelligence — even distinct personalities — that live within us. It is a much larger realm than most of us realize, one that has a complete life of its own running parallel to the ordinary life we live day to day.

— Robert A. Johnsonfootnote 5

Historically speaking, complex psychology was the title Carl Jung preferred to describe his psychological approach. Though anecdotal accounts often suggest that the term had to do with the centrality of the personal complex in Jung’s theories, Shamdasani writes that Jung’s intention for the phrase embraced the complexity of the psychefootnote 6 rather than emphasizing the prominence of complexes within it.

Over time, analytical psychology has become the more common umbrella term for Jungian practice and theory, though depth psychology is sometimes used fairly interchangeably. Despite Jung’s preferences, complex psychology, as a term for his psychology, is little used.

A more contemporary application of the term complex psychology is offered from a practical standpoint: the term complex psychology reflects a psychological approach which posits that the complex is the fundamental unit of the psyche, and is key to understanding most of the processes of the human inner life. Acknowledging that there are a number of lenses one can use to view complexes, my work focuses on the personal complex as an autonomous subpersonality in the psyche.

Practical applications .

Under the heading of complex psychology, one might find these subject areas and inquiries:

Cite This Entry.

Suggested APA citation for this entry:
Harkey, F. (xxxxx). xxxxx. The Research of Faith Harkey. https://faithharkey.com/0/101

Hyperlink to this lexicon entry:
https://faithharkey.com/complex

Notes.

  1. Jung, C. G. (1969). A review of the complex theory (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 8. Structure and dynamics of the psyche (2nd ed., pp. 92-104). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1948) (p. 97)
    WorldCat reference
    return
  2. Jung, C. G. (1969). The psychological foundations of belief in spirits (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 8. Structure and dynamics of the psyche (2nd ed., pp. 301-318). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1948) (p. 307)
    WorldCat reference
    return
  3. Schwartz, R. C., & Sweezy, M. (2020). Internal family systems therapy: Second edition. The Guilford Press. (p. ix)
    WorldCat reference
    return
  4. Jacobsen, M.-E. (1999). The gifted adult: A revolutionary guide for liberating everyday genius. Ballentine. (p. 151)
    WorldCat reference
    return
  5. Johnson, R. A. (1986). Inner work. Harper & Row. (p. 3)
    WorldCat reference
    return
  6. Shamdasani, S. (2003). Jung and the making of modern psychology. Cambridge University Press. (p.14)
    DOI reference
    return